Oil-based drilling fluids with a density of 2.04 g/cm³ and oil/water ratios of 85:15 and 90:10 were prepared using emulsifying and wetting agents, high-temperature stabilizer with certain viscosity-reducing effect, organophilic clay, and fluid loss control additives produced by Unitech Chemicals (Kaiping) Ltd.
The fluids were hot rolled at 200°C or 232°C, respectively. Rheological properties, electrical stability, and high-temperature high-pressure fluid loss were measured before and after hot rolling.
Drill cuttings contamination and 4% brine contamination tests were also conducted on the oil-based drilling fluids to simulate field conditions such as drill cuttings contamination or water invasion, in order to meet the technical requirements of high-temperature and high-pressure drilling operations.
The formulation is shown in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1 Formulation of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 85:15
Material Name | Product Name | Amount / g |
3# White Oil | 147.57 | |
High-Temperature Emulsifying and Wetting Agent | UT-MUL(HT) | 28~30 |
High-Temperature Organophilic Clay | UT-Gel(HT) | 8~8.5 |
Calcium Oxide | CaO | 7.5 |
25% Calcium Chloride Solution | CaCl2 Solution(25%) | 39.53 |
High-Temperature Fluid Loss Control Additive | UT-L3 | 16 |
Barite | Barite | 595 |
Mud Preparation Procedure:
a) Weigh 3# white oil and UT-MUL (HT) into a high-speed mixing cup, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 5 minutes.
b) Reduce the speed to 6,000 r/min. While stirring, slowly add UT-Gel (HT) and CaO. After the addition is completed, increase the speed to 11,000 r/min and mix at high speed for 10 minutes.
c) At 11,000 r/min, slowly add CaCl₂ Solution (25%). After the addition is completed, continue high-speed mixing for 20 minutes.
d) Stop mixing, remove the high-speed mixing cup, add UT-L3 and Barite, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 30 minutes.
e) After the oil-based mud is prepared, heat it to 50°C, then measure the electrical stability ES and rheological properties.
The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 1-1. After hot rolling at 200°C for 16 hours, the performance of the oil-based drilling fluid was tested at 50°C.
After the performance test was completed, 30 g RevDust was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled for a second time at 200°C for 16 hours, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 1-2.
Table 1-2 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 85:15 Before and After Hot Rolling at 200°C
Item | Before Hot Rolling | After Hot Rolling 200°C × 16 hr | After Adding 30 g RevDust Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 30 g RevDust and Hot Rolling at 200°C × 16 hr |
Ф600/Ф300 | 214/137 | 111/60 | 148/83 | 170/103 |
Ф200/Ф100 | 107/74 | 42/25 | 60/36 | 79/53 |
Ф6/Ф3 | 28/25 | 4/3 | 7/6 | 19/18 |
Gel(10''/10')/pa/pa | 12/15.5 | 2.5/4.5 | 3.5/5.5 | 8.5/13.5 |
AV/mPa·s | 107 | 55.5 | 74 | 85 |
PV/mPa·s | 77 | 51 | 65 | 67 |
YP/Pa | 30 | 4.5 | 9 | 18 |
ES/V | >2000 | 725 | 392 | 511 |
HTHP180℃ FL/ml | 4.0 | 4.2 |
The test results in Table 1-2 show that the drilling fluid with an oil/water ratio of 85:15 and a density of 2.04 g/cm³ maintained good rheological properties at 50°C after hot rolling and aging at 200°C for 16 hours. It also showed high electrical stability and low HTHP fluid loss.
After adding 30 g of RevDust for contamination and hot rolling at 200°C for 16 hours, the drilling fluid still maintained relatively good rheological performance, indicating that this oil-based drilling fluid has strong resistance to drill cuttings contamination.
The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 1-1. After hot rolling at 200°C for 16 hours, the performance of the oil-based drilling fluid was tested at 50°C. After the performance test was completed, 20 g of 4% sodium chloride brine was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled for a second time at 200°C for 16 hours, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 1-3.
Table 1-3 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 85:15 Before and After Hot Rolling at 200°C
Item | Before Hot Rolling | After Hot Rolling 200°C × 16 hr | After Adding 20 g of 4% Sodium Chloride Brine, Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine and Hot Rolling at 200°C for 16 hr |
Ф600/Ф300 | 207/130 | 126/69 | 138/79 | 178/108 |
Ф200/Ф100 | 103/71 | 50/29 | 58/35 | 82/53 |
Ф6/Ф3 | 27/25 | 6/5 | 9/7 | 18/17 |
Gel(10''/10')/pa/pa | 12/15 | 3.5/5.5 | 4.5/7 | 8/12.5 |
AV/mPa·s | 103.5 | 63.5 | 69 | 89 |
PV/mPa·s | 77 | 57 | 59 | 70 |
YP/Pa | 26.5 | 6 | 10 | 19 |
ES/V | >2000 | 821 | 397 | 469 |
HTHP180℃ FL/ml | 3.6 | 4.0 |
Table 1-3 shows that the 2.04 g/cm³ OBM with an 85:15 oil/water ratio maintained good rheology after aging at 200°C for 16 h. After contamination with 20 g of 4% NaCl brine and a second 200°C × 16 h hot roll, the fluid showed some thickening, but its overall performance still met field drilling requirements. To further improve performance, 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) was added, followed by a third 200°C × 16 h hot roll. The results are shown in Table 1-4.
Table 1-4 Performance Before and After Hot Rolling Aging at 200°C for 16 h
Item | After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, 200°C × 16 h | After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), After Hot Rolling |
Ф600/Ф300 | 138/79 | 178/108 | 152/97 | 156/97 |
Ф200/Ф100 | 58/35 | 82/53 | 77/53 | 76/52 |
Ф6/Ф3 | 9/7 | 18/17 | 20/18 | 18/17 |
Gel(10''/10')/pa/pa | 4.5/7 | 8/12.5 | 8.5/10.5 | 8/11.5 |
AV/mPa·s | 69 | 89 | 76 | 78 |
PV/mPa·s | 59 | 70 | 55 | 59 |
YP/Pa | 10 | 19 | 21 | 19 |
ES/V | 397 | 469 | 787 | 548 |
HTHP180℃ FL/ml | 4.0 | 5.4 |
Table 1-4 shows that after adding 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) and hot rolling at 200°C for 16 h for the third time, the rheology of the oil-based drilling fluid improved. This indicates that this high-temperature, high-density oil-based drilling fluid system can meet field HTHP drilling requirements.
The formulation is shown in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Formulation of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 90:10
Material Name | Product Name | Amount / g |
3# White Oil | 156.25 | |
High-Temperature Emulsifying and Wetting Agent | UT-MUL(HT) | 26~27 |
High-Temperature Stabilizer | UT-STAB(HT) | 6 |
High-Temperature Organophilic Clay | UT-Gel(HT) | 8 |
Calcium Oxide | CaO | 7.5 |
25% Calcium Chloride Solution | CaCl2 Solution(25%) | 26.35 |
High-Temperature Fluid Loss Control Additive | UT-L3 | 16 |
Barite | Barite | 595 |
Mud Preparation Procedure:
a) Weigh 3# white oil, UT-MUL (HT), and UT-STAB (HT) into a high-speed mixing cup, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 5 minutes.
b) Reduce the speed to 6,000 r/min. While stirring, slowly add UT-Gel (HT) and CaO. After the addition is completed, increase the speed to 11,000 r/min and mix at high speed for 10 minutes.
c) At 11,000 r/min, slowly add CaCl₂ Solution (25%). After the addition is completed, mix at high speed for 20 minutes.
d) Stop stirring, remove the high-speed mixing cup, add UT-L3 and Barite, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 30 minutes.
e) After the oil-based mud is prepared, heat it to 50°C, then measure the electrical stability ES and rheological properties.
The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 2-1. After hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h, the fluid performance was tested at 50°C. After the test, 30 g RevDust was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled at 232°C for 16 h, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 2-2.
Table 2-2 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 90:10 Before and After Hot Rolling at 232°C
Item | Before Hot Rolling | After Hot Rolling 232°C × 16 hr | After Adding 30 g RevDust, Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 30 g RevDust and Hot Rolling at 232°C × 16 h |
Ф600/Ф300 | 163/103 | 115/67 | 121/72 | 145/89 |
Ф200/Ф100 | 80/55 | 50/32 | 54/35 | 69/47 |
Ф6/Ф3 | 21/19 | 10/9 | 11/10 | 19/18 |
Gel(10''/10')/pa/pa | 8.5/11.5 | 4.5/8.5 | 5/8 | 8.5/13 |
AV/mPa·s | 81 | 57.5 | 60.5 | 72.5 |
PV/mPa·s | 59 | 48 | 49 | 56 |
YP/Pa | 22 | 9.5 | 11.5 | 16.5 |
ES/V | >2000 | 844 | 590 | 599 |
HTHP180℃ FL/ml | 5.0 | 6.0 |
The test results show that the drilling fluid with an oil/water ratio of 90:10 and a density of 2.04 g/cm³ maintained good rheological performance at 50°C after hot rolling and aging at 232°C for 16 h. It also showed high electrical stability and low HTHP fluid loss. After contamination with 30 g RevDust and hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h, the drilling fluid rheology remained stable, indicating strong resistance to drill cuttings contamination.
The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 2-1. After hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h, the fluid performance was tested at 50°C. After the test, 20 g of 4% sodium chloride brine was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled for a second time at 232°C for 16 h, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 2-3.
Table 2-3 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 90:10 Before and After Hot Rolling at 232°C
Item | Before Hot Rolling | After Hot Rolling 232°C × 16 h | After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine and Hot Rolling at 232°C × 16 h |
Ф600/Ф300 | 171/108 | 111/65 | 124/76 | 158/99 |
Ф200/Ф100 | 85/59 | 49/31 | 61/41 | 78/55 |
Ф6/Ф3 | 23/21 | 10/9 | 15/14 | 25/24 |
Gel(10''/10')/pa/pa | 10/11 | 4.5/8 | 6/9 | 10.5/17 |
AV/mPa·s | 85.5 | 55.5 | 62 | 79 |
PV/mPa·s | 63 | 46 | 48 | 59 |
YP/Pa | 22.5 | 9.5 | 14 | 20 |
ES/V | >2000 | 860 | 654 | 510 |
HTHP180℃ FL/ml | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Table 2-3 shows that the 2.04 g/cm³ OBM with a 90:10 oil/water ratio maintained good rheology after aging at 232°C for 16 h. After contamination with 20 g of 4% NaCl brine and a second 232°C × 16 h hot roll, the fluid showed some thickening, but its overall performance still met field drilling requirements. To further improve performance, 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) was added, followed by a third 232°C × 16 h hot roll. The results are shown in Table 2-4.
Table 2-4 Performance Before and After 16 h Hot Rolling at 232°C
Item | After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, 232°C × 16 h | After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), Before Hot Rolling | After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), After Hot Rolling |
Ф600/Ф300 | 124/76 | 158/99 | 169/114 | 120/71 |
Ф200/Ф100 | 61/41 | 78/55 | 92/68 | 54/36 |
Ф6/Ф3 | 15/14 | 25/24 | 31/29 | 12/12 |
Gel(10''/10')/pa/pa | 6/9 | 10.5/17 | 13/18 | 6/9.5 |
AV/mPa·s | 62 | 79 | 84.5 | 60 |
PV/mPa·s | 48 | 59 | 55 | 49 |
YP/Pa | 14 | 20 | 29.5 | 11 |
ES/V | 654 | 510 | 1142 | 498 |
HTHP180℃ FL/ml | 6.0 | 7.4 |
Table 2-4 shows that after adding 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) and hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h for the third time, the HTHP fluid loss increased slightly, but the rheology of the oil-based drilling fluid improved. This indicates that this high-temperature, high-density oil-based drilling fluid system can meet field HTHP drilling requirements.
(1)This high-temperature, high-density oil-based drilling fluid system can meet HTHP drilling requirements at 232°C and at a density above 2.0 g/cm³.
(2)When preparing oil-based drilling fluids at temperatures not exceeding 200°C, it is not necessary to add the high-temperature stabilizer UT-STAB (HT); only the high-temperature emulsifying and wetting agent UT-MUL (HT) is required. When the temperature exceeds 200°C, such as 232°C, both UT-STAB (HT) and UT-MUL (HT) are required. If the apparent viscosity or yield point of the drilling fluid is too high, adding UT-STAB (HT) can reduce the viscosity and yield point after high-temperature aging, indicating that UT-STAB (HT) has a certain viscosity-reducing effect.