Unitech Chemicals, High-Performance Drilling Fluid Additives Manufacturer for Oil & Water-Based Mud Systems
17605551849405539
Blog

Oil Based Drilling Fluids with a Density of 2.04 g/cm³ and Different Oil/Water Ratios at 200°C–232°C

Oil Based Drilling Fluids

Oil-based drilling fluids with a density of 2.04 g/cm³ and oil/water ratios of 85:15 and 90:10 were prepared using emulsifying and wetting agents, high-temperature stabilizer with certain viscosity-reducing effect, organophilic clay, and fluid loss control additives produced by Unitech Chemicals (Kaiping) Ltd.

The fluids were hot rolled at 200°C or 232°C, respectively. Rheological properties, electrical stability, and high-temperature high-pressure fluid loss were measured before and after hot rolling.

Drill cuttings contamination and 4% brine contamination tests were also conducted on the oil-based drilling fluids to simulate field conditions such as drill cuttings contamination or water invasion, in order to meet the technical requirements of high-temperature and high-pressure drilling operations.

 

1. Performance of Oil-Based Drilling Fluid Resistant to 200°C

1.1. Oil-Based Drilling Fluid Formulation

The formulation is shown in Table 1-1.


Table 1-1 Formulation of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 85:15 

Material Name

Product Name

Amount / g

3# White Oil


147.57

High-Temperature Emulsifying and Wetting Agent

UT-MULHT

28~30

High-Temperature Organophilic Clay

UT-GelHT

8~8.5

Calcium Oxide

CaO

7.5

25% Calcium Chloride Solution

CaCl2 Solution(25%)

39.53

High-Temperature Fluid Loss Control Additive

UT-L3

16

Barite

Barite

595


Mud Preparation Procedure

a) Weigh 3# white oil and UT-MUL (HT) into a high-speed mixing cup, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 5 minutes.

b) Reduce the speed to 6,000 r/min. While stirring, slowly add UT-Gel (HT) and CaO. After the addition is completed, increase the speed to 11,000 r/min and mix at high speed for 10 minutes.

c) At 11,000 r/min, slowly add CaCl₂ Solution (25%). After the addition is completed, continue high-speed mixing for 20 minutes.

d) Stop mixing, remove the high-speed mixing cup, add UT-L3 and Barite, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 30 minutes.

e) After the oil-based mud is prepared, heat it to 50°C, then measure the electrical stability ES and rheological properties.

 

1.2. Performance of Oil-Based Drilling Fluid

    The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 1-1. After hot rolling at 200°C for 16 hours, the performance of the oil-based drilling fluid was tested at 50°C.

After the performance test was completed, 30 g RevDust was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled for a second time at 200°C for 16 hours, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 1-2.


 Table 1-2 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 85:15 Before and After Hot Rolling at 200°C

Item

Before Hot Rolling

After Hot Rolling 200°C × 16 hr

After Adding 30 g RevDust Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 30 g RevDust and Hot Rolling at 200°C × 16 hr

Ф600300

214/137

111/60

148/83

170/103

Ф200100

107/74

42/25

60/36

79/53

Ф63

28/25

4/3

7/6

19/18

Gel10''/10'/pa/pa

12/15.5

2.5/4.5

3.5/5.5

8.5/13.5

AV/mPa·s

107

55.5

74

85

PV/mPa·s

77

51

65

67

YP/Pa

30

4.5

9

18

ES/V

2000

725

392

511

HTHP180℃ FL/ml


4.0


4.2

 

The test results in Table 1-2 show that the drilling fluid with an oil/water ratio of 85:15 and a density of 2.04 g/cm³ maintained good rheological properties at 50°C after hot rolling and aging at 200°C for 16 hours. It also showed high electrical stability and low HTHP fluid loss.

After adding 30 g of RevDust for contamination and hot rolling at 200°C for 16 hours, the drilling fluid still maintained relatively good rheological performance, indicating that this oil-based drilling fluid has strong resistance to drill cuttings contamination.

The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 1-1. After hot rolling at 200°C for 16 hours, the performance of the oil-based drilling fluid was tested at 50°C. After the performance test was completed, 20 g of 4% sodium chloride brine was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled for a second time at 200°C for 16 hours, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 1-3.


Table 1-3 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 85:15 Before and After Hot Rolling at 200°C

Item

Before Hot Rolling

After Hot Rolling 200°C × 16 hr

After Adding 20 g of 4% Sodium Chloride Brine, Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine and Hot Rolling at 200°C for 16 hr

Ф600300

207/130

126/69

138/79

178/108

Ф200100

103/71

50/29

58/35

82/53

Ф63

27/25

6/5

9/7

18/17

Gel10''/10'/pa/pa

12/15

3.5/5.5

4.5/7

8/12.5

AV/mPa·s

103.5

63.5

69

89

PV/mPa·s

77

57

59

70

YP/Pa

26.5

6

10

19

ES/V

2000

821

397

469

HTHP180℃ FL/ml


3.6


4.0


Table 1-3 shows that the 2.04 g/cm³ OBM with an 85:15 oil/water ratio maintained good rheology after aging at 200°C for 16 h. After contamination with 20 g of 4% NaCl brine and a second 200°C × 16 h hot roll, the fluid showed some thickening, but its overall performance still met field drilling requirements. To further improve performance, 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) was added, followed by a third 200°C × 16 h hot roll. The results are shown in Table 1-4.

 

Table 1-4 Performance Before and After Hot Rolling Aging at 200°C for 16 h

Item

After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, 200°C × 16 h

After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), After Hot Rolling

Ф600300

138/79

178/108

152/97

156/97

Ф200100

58/35

82/53

77/53

76/52

Ф63

9/7

18/17

20/18

18/17

Gel10''/10'/pa/pa

4.5/7

8/12.5

8.5/10.5

8/11.5

AV/mPa·s

69

89

76

78

PV/mPa·s

59

70

55

59

YP/Pa

10

19

21

19

ES/V

397

469

787

548

HTHP180℃ FL/ml


4.0


5.4


Table 1-4 shows that after adding 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) and hot rolling at 200°C for 16 h for the third time, the rheology of the oil-based drilling fluid improved. This indicates that this high-temperature, high-density oil-based drilling fluid system can meet field HTHP drilling requirements.

 

2. Performance of Oil-Based Drilling Fluid Resistant to 232°C

2.1. Oil-Based Drilling Fluid Formulation

The formulation is shown in Table 2-1.


Table 2-1 Formulation of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 90:10

Material Name

Product Name

Amount / g

3# White Oil


156.25

High-Temperature Emulsifying and Wetting Agent

UT-MULHT

26~27

High-Temperature Stabilizer

UT-STABHT

6

High-Temperature Organophilic Clay

UT-GelHT

8

Calcium Oxide

CaO

7.5

 

25% Calcium Chloride Solution

CaCl2 Solution(25%)

26.35

High-Temperature Fluid Loss Control Additive

UT-L3

16

Barite

Barite

595


Mud Preparation Procedure

a) Weigh 3# white oil, UT-MUL (HT), and UT-STAB (HT) into a high-speed mixing cup, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 5 minutes.

b) Reduce the speed to 6,000 r/min. While stirring, slowly add UT-Gel (HT) and CaO. After the addition is completed, increase the speed to 11,000 r/min and mix at high speed for 10 minutes.

c) At 11,000 r/min, slowly add CaCl₂ Solution (25%). After the addition is completed, mix at high speed for 20 minutes.

d) Stop stirring, remove the high-speed mixing cup, add UT-L3 and Barite, and mix at 11,000 r/min for 30 minutes.

e) After the oil-based mud is prepared, heat it to 50°C, then measure the electrical stability ES and rheological properties.

 

2.2. Performance of Oil-Based Drilling Fluid

The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 2-1. After hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h, the fluid performance was tested at 50°C. After the test, 30 g RevDust was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled at 232°C for 16 h, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 2-2.


Table 2-2 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 90:10 Before and After Hot Rolling at 232°C

Item

Before Hot Rolling

After Hot Rolling 232°C × 16 hr

After Adding 30 g RevDust, Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 30 g RevDust and Hot Rolling at 232°C × 16 h

Ф600300

163/103

115/67

121/72

145/89

Ф200100

80/55

50/32

54/35

69/47

Ф63

21/19

10/9

11/10

19/18

Gel10''/10'/pa/pa

8.5/11.5

4.5/8.5

5/8

8.5/13

AV/mPa·s

81

57.5

60.5

72.5

PV/mPa·s

59

48

49

56

YP/Pa

22

9.5

11.5

16.5

ES/V

2000

844

590

599

HTHP180℃ FL/ml


5.0


6.0

 

The test results show that the drilling fluid with an oil/water ratio of 90:10 and a density of 2.04 g/cm³ maintained good rheological performance at 50°C after hot rolling and aging at 232°C for 16 h. It also showed high electrical stability and low HTHP fluid loss. After contamination with 30 g RevDust and hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h, the drilling fluid rheology remained stable, indicating strong resistance to drill cuttings contamination.

The oil-based drilling fluid was prepared according to the formulation in Table 2-1. After hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h, the fluid performance was tested at 50°C. After the test, 20 g of 4% sodium chloride brine was added for contamination. The fluid was then hot rolled for a second time at 232°C for 16 h, and the drilling fluid performance before and after hot rolling was tested. The results are shown in Table 2-3.


Table 2-3 Performance of 2.04 g/cm³ Oil-Based Drilling Fluid with an Oil/Water Ratio of 90:10 Before and After Hot Rolling at 232°C

Item

Before Hot Rolling

After Hot Rolling 232°C × 16 h

After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine,

Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine and Hot Rolling at 232°C × 16 h

Ф600300

171/108

111/65

124/76

158/99

Ф200100

85/59

49/31

61/41

78/55

Ф63

23/21

10/9

15/14

25/24

Gel10''/10'/pa/pa

10/11

4.5/8

6/9

10.5/17

AV/mPa·s

85.5

55.5

62

79

PV/mPa·s

63

46

48

59

YP/Pa

22.5

9.5

14

20

ES/V

2000

860

654

510

HTHP180℃  FL/ml


5.0


6.0


Table 2-3 shows that the 2.04 g/cm³ OBM with a 90:10 oil/water ratio maintained good rheology after aging at 232°C for 16 h. After contamination with 20 g of 4% NaCl brine and a second 232°C × 16 h hot roll, the fluid showed some thickening, but its overall performance still met field drilling requirements. To further improve performance, 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) was added, followed by a third 232°C × 16 h hot roll. The results are shown in Table 2-4.


Table 2-4 Performance Before and After 16 h Hot Rolling at 232°C

Item

After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 20 g of 4% NaCl Brine, 232°C × 16 h

After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), Before Hot Rolling

After Adding 4 g UT-STAB (HT), After Hot Rolling

Ф600300

124/76

158/99

169/114

120/71

Ф200100

61/41

78/55

92/68

54/36

 

Ф63

15/14

25/24

31/29

12/12

Gel10''/10'/pa/pa

6/9

10.5/17

13/18

6/9.5

AV/mPa·s

62

79

84.5

60

PV/mPa·s

48

59

55

49

YP/Pa

14

20

29.5

11

ES/V

654

510

1142

498

HTHP180℃  FL/ml


6.0


7.4


Table 2-4 shows that after adding 4 g of UT-STAB (HT) and hot rolling at 232°C for 16 h for the third time, the HTHP fluid loss increased slightly, but the rheology of the oil-based drilling fluid improved. This indicates that this high-temperature, high-density oil-based drilling fluid system can meet field HTHP drilling requirements.

 

3. Conclusion

1This high-temperature, high-density oil-based drilling fluid system can meet HTHP drilling requirements at 232°C and at a density above 2.0 g/cm³.

2When preparing oil-based drilling fluids at temperatures not exceeding 200°C, it is not necessary to add the high-temperature stabilizer UT-STAB (HT); only the high-temperature emulsifying and wetting agent UT-MUL (HT) is required. When the temperature exceeds 200°C, such as 232°C, both UT-STAB (HT) and UT-MUL (HT) are required. If the apparent viscosity or yield point of the drilling fluid is too high, adding UT-STAB (HT) can reduce the viscosity and yield point after high-temperature aging, indicating that UT-STAB (HT) has a certain viscosity-reducing  effect.

uck@unitechkp.com